Why look for practitioners doing on-the-ground work at personal risk?
This is our mandate from our donors, the Oak Foundation, which is based in Geneva. Their model was a Turkish woman trained at the International Center for the Rehabilitation of Torture Victims in Copenhagen (which they also support) who lobbies against torture and other inhuman prison conditions despite death threats and harassment. Our first Oak Fellow was a Pakistani journalist who was jailed for his reporting on child bonded labor. Another was a Congolese activist who founded an NGO to protect civilians from political violence in one of the most war-torn parts of the eastern Congo near the Rwandan border. The rationale is that these are the people who most need a respite from difficult front-line duties for the purposes of reflection, writing, and communicating their work to the campus community.
Related Questions
- Will the fact that many of the Service Providers are overseas increase the risk that HMRC will look to employment businesses, as the parties with greater assets, to transfer debts?
- What is the National Zoo doing to minimize the risk for the animals at the Zoo?
- Why look for practitioners doing on-the-ground work at personal risk?