Why isn there any record of millions of Jews wandering in the desert?
There has been a lot of speculation on the route of the Exodus and why the traditional site hasn’t yielded any archaeological evidence. After all, if two million people wander in a desert for forty years, you’d think that at least something would be found to support it. But, nothing at all has been unearthed in the Sinai Peninsula supporting the biblical account of the Exodus. Various explanations for this range from the idea that it is naturally difficult to find any archeological evidence in a desert of sand to the explanation that the traditional site is the wrong one. First of all, no archaeological find has ever contradicted the Bible. Archaeology has only confirmed what the Bible says. As has been the case with so many other things in the Bible, as archaeology progresses, they will most certainly uncover evidence in the future. The Bible has yet to be proven wrong by archaeology. Second, lack of evidence doesn’t mean there wasn’t an Exodus. However, this is a slippery slope since
Related Questions
- May I be paid a DLA when I PCS from my permanent duty station/place of active duty to my home of record or home of selection (HOR/HOS) when I leave the Service?
- Can the webserver log files record the client browsers encryption capabilities?
- Why are Small Southern Colleges Suddenly Attracting Jews in Record Numbers?
