WHY ISNT THE SAN MATEO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY PROSECUTING SAN BRUNO MAYOR LARRY FRANZELLA FOR PERJURY?
By Bill Baker, J.D. Editor and Publisher, The San Bruno Beacon So far, the San Mateo County District Attorney’s Office has not prosecuted San Bruno Mayor Larry Franzella for the 16 material omissions he made on three different Statements of Economic Interest (California Form 700) he filed in three different years and signed “Under Penalty of Perjury” in San Bruno. The Statements of Economic Interest (California Form 700) that Mr. Franzella signed specifically stated: “5. Verification I have used all reasonable diligence in preparing this statement. I have reviewed this statement and to the best of my knowledge the information contained herein and in any attached schedules is true and complete. I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.” When you have a District Attorney (DA) and Chief Deputy District Attorney (CDDA) who refuse to enforce the laws of the State of California against a person in a position of politi
Related Questions
- How does the Southern San Mateo County Task Force on New Hospital Construction relate to the PAMF San Carlos Medical Facility Application?
- WHY ISNT THE SAN MATEO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY PROSECUTING SAN BRUNO MAYOR LARRY FRANZELLA FOR PERJURY?
- What does the Douglas County District Attorneys Child Support Division do?
