Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why is XeCT/CBF method superior to others?

CBF method superior xect
0
Posted

Why is XeCT/CBF method superior to others?

0

The basis of XeCT/CBF is the Fick principle (1870) of a diffusible tracer (DT) as applied to the human brain in 1948 by Kety/Schmidt and refined by Kety in 1951 12,13,14. It has been validated against every known quantitative CBF method. CBF measured using DTs is a physiological measurement. Similar measurements with non-diffusible tracers (NDTs) are anatomical measurements claiming to be physiological measurements. Current attempts to quantify non-diffusible tracer studies will provide reasonable to excellent data in humans with a normal cerebrovascular (CV) system. In neurovascularly compromised patients, non-diffusible methods are destined to failure due to the following reasons: a) NDTs are highly dependent on the vascularization of the brain, or how it got there. DTs answer the question is it there?. NDTs are a snapshot in time (MTT and TTP < 10 seconds), where a DT measures 4-5 minutes of tissue enhancement. This is an extremely important consideration in patients with collateral

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123