Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why is there no operation to see if a string represented as FSA1 is accepted by an acceptor FSA2?

0
Posted

Why is there no operation to see if a string represented as FSA1 is accepted by an acceptor FSA2?

0

This is equivalent to seeing if their intersection is non-empty. • How can I test if an acceptor/transducer corresponds to the empty language/transduction? This is equivalent to checking if the output of fsmconnect has no states. This can be tested using fsmconnect -t, which returns exit status 1 if its output has no states. • Why is there no operation for converting an acceptor into the corresponding transducer (i.e., the identity transducer restricted to the strings in the acceptor)? It is not needed; the FSM library automatically intreprets any acceptor argument as the corresponding transducer where appropriate. • Why is there no operation to transduce acceptor FSA by transducer FST? This is equivalent to composing FSA with FST and then projecting on to the output side. • I built an acceptor/tranducer, but it does not accept/transduce anything! Did you forget to specify the final states? • I can build acceptors fine, but my transducers don’t compile correctly! Did you forget the “-

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123