Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why is the service requirement for Peer Reviewers and Program Participants different?

0
10 Posted

Why is the service requirement for Peer Reviewers and Program Participants different?

0
10

The difference grows out of different goals for establishing the two groups. The service requirement for participants was set artificially high to keep the applicant pool size manageable for the pilot year. With a maximum of only 25 pilot year participants competing for a very attractive permanent salary enhancement, program designers felt the service requirements for participants (ten years continuous service at Clemson and at least one year in the applicant’s current job at Clemson) was a reasonable starting point toward that manageability goal. If the program moves beyond the pilot test, those numbers could be adjusted significantly based on the pilot year experience. In contrast, the service requirement for reviewers (five years state service at Clemson or elsewhere and one year in current Clemson position) is not aimed at limiting the number of applicants for hard work that will have explicitly no financial reward and, instead, is aimed at assuring that reviewers have sufficient e

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123