Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why is the IBDX panel better than other existing serological tests, such as ASCA and pANCA?

0
Posted

Why is the IBDX panel better than other existing serological tests, such as ASCA and pANCA?

0

No other existing marker has the ability to aid in the differentiation of IBD vs. non-IBD. In distinguishing between CD and UC. Glycominds’ IBDX panel has is proven to be superior, providing significantly higher performance, higher sensitivity and higher specificity, whereas the combination of ASCA /pANCA provide ~50-60% positive predictive value Further benefits include: • Over 90% positive prediction value (PPV) for IBD diagnosis when compared with other GI diseases Over 85% PPV for the differentiation between CD and UC.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123