Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why is Social Stratification Universal?

0
Posted

Why is Social Stratification Universal?

0

A. According to the functionalist view expressed by Kingsley Davis and Wilbert Moore, stratification is inevitable. • Society must make certain that its important positions are filled; to guarantee that the more important positions are filled by the more qualified people, society must offer them greater rewards. • Davis and Moore argued that society offers greater rewards for its more responsible, demanding, and accountable positions. B. Melvin Tumin was the first to present a number of criticisms to the Davis and Moore thesis. • He asked how the importance of a position is measured (e.g., Is a surgeon really more important to society than a garbage collector? ). Rewards cannot be used to measure the importance of a job; there must be some independent measure of importance. • He noted that if stratification worked as Davis and Moore describe it, society would be a meritocracy a form of social stratification in which all positions are awarded on the basis of merit but it does not work t

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123