Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why is ProTreat better than other packages for amine treating?

0
Posted

Why is ProTreat better than other packages for amine treating?

0

Other packages deliver results in terms of the number of theoretical stages, in the absence of field data and/or experience they cannot predict column performance for selective treating, they cannot deal properly with packing and unusual applications like acid gas enrichment, and they leave you wondering how to translate theoretical stages into real tower internals. ProTreat uses a column model based on sound mass and heat transfer rate fundamentals. It has no adjustable parameters and it predicts performance without needing field data of any kind. You are never asked to translate theoretical stages into tray counts and packed bed heights. Packing and acid gas enrichment present no challenge at all. And ProTreat is a fully flexible flowsheeting package—it is not limited to a handful of fixed, predefined flowsheet configurations.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123