Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why is meant by “non-recourse” when referring to lawsuit loans?

lawsuit Loans meant referring
0
Posted

Why is meant by “non-recourse” when referring to lawsuit loans?

0

A. A lawsuit loan is really not a loan. It is actually an investment in the outcome of a lawsuit. When the plaintiff and attorney reach an out-of-court settlement or win the case at trial, the lawsuit loan plus the accumulated risk premium on that advance is repaid from the proceeds of the settlement. However, should the plaintiff and attorney fail to reach a settlement or lose the case in court, they owe nothing! The company that made the loan (or, more accurately, the investment) has “no recourse” to collect the money it advanced, thus the term “non-recourse”.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123