Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why is M40 quite an inconspicuous Double Star?

0
0 Posted

Why is M40 quite an inconspicuous Double Star?

0
0

Messier scanned the region of this object when he was looking for a non-existing nebula reported by the 17th century astronomer Johann Hevelius (who had reported few real and several nonexistent nebulae). He ended up in the assumption that his object M40 (today also known as Winnecke 4) was the binary which Hevelius had erroneously seen as nebulous. It seems however that Hevelius had observed another (nearby) double star, 74 Ursae Maioris.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123