Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why is logging old-growth forests a problem if new trees grow back?

0
Posted

Why is logging old-growth forests a problem if new trees grow back?

0

When you log an old-growth forest, huge amounts of carbon pollution are released. While young regrowth sucks in carbon, it takes 150 years for a forest to recapture all the carbon lost after logging. We must reduce carbon pollution as soon as possible to avoid dangerous climate change. Q7: Why does the forest industry say logging is not causing climate change? A: The logging industry has been misleading the public by saying: – that young re-growth forests can suck up more carbon than old growth forests, – that wood products store carbon so it doesn’t lead to carbon pollution. The logging industry conveniently ignores the massive carbon pollution that occurs when the original forest is logged; and most of the wood also ends up as carbon pollution because the woodchips become paper and then waste within three years. Q8: Isn’t it too late to stop climate change? A: Scientists agree that some warming has already occurred. However they also believe that if we can limit this increase to 2deg

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123