WHY IS LAWYER LOGIC MORE IMPORTANT TO MANKIND THAN SCIENTIST LOGIC?
NASA scientists, alcoholics, and other highly credible people around the world stated they experienced psychic phenomenon. While orthodox scientists will say, “Ha, you cannot reduce it in the laboratory so that we can test it and apply statistics, therefore we reject your experience,” lawyers who are no longer playing with a full deck understand that any courtroom is a superior place to prove anything which is not so. We have seen countless examples of where courts have concluded that up is down, that black is white, and witness testimony is always more reliable than the facts. The courts will inevitably argue something like this: although science may not accept the evidence of the existence of Easter bunnies, the Tooth Fairy, and Compassionate Conservatives, the court WILL accept it because the evidence has been tested, highly credible people repeatedly stated they have witnessed these things, orthodox science did not prove the phenomenon did not have credibility or it could not have
