Why is it not possible to combine the different methodological views just like that?
It would be the same thing as trying to believe in two things at the same time as one is trying to accomplish one. Like trying to find the correct road for the car at the same time as one is using two maps which are showing two completely different kinds of roads. Or like navigating at sea using two different basic methods, partly one based on that Earth is flat and that we try not to fall over the edge, partly another one which is based on that Earth is a globe and that we can sail around it. These very simplified experiments show that behind maps and navigation methods there are ultimate presumptions operating as a kind a premises for thinking and acting. The result of a knowledge-creating effort is normally placed against the ultimate presumptions that the study is resting on, and then it becomes somewhat difficult to present one’s results if they rest on that there is a factive of us independent reality at the same time as it is seen as socially constructed. The situation then beco
Related Questions
- Is it possible to procure the Clampcrete system components separately from different sources and still achieve the certified crash-tested system?
- Why is it not possible to combine the different methodological views just like that?
- Is it possible to bond different surfaces such as metal to glass using Powerbond?
