Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why is a warning generated stating that API-650 Appendix P is intended for tanks more than 120 feet in diameter?

0
Posted

Why is a warning generated stating that API-650 Appendix P is intended for tanks more than 120 feet in diameter?

0

Appendix P was written from two technical papers, publishing the findings for two full scale tanks that were instrumented, tested, and verified by finite element analysis. Both of these tanks were more than 120 ft in diameter. The shell curvature of these tanks is much greater than the nozzle diameter, so the behavior is more like a nozzle intersecting a plate instead of a cylinder-cylinder intersection. Tanks much smaller than 120 ft in diameter behave differently (more like a cylinder-cylinder intersection), and the results obtained from Appendix P may not be applicable or accurate. TANK provides an alternative computation procedure for smaller tanks. This procedure is described in PVP-1279.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123