Why is a teacher displaying such blatant anti-gun bias?
To anyone reading Katherine Letellier’s letter, which takes issue with the Second Amendment coverage and her perceived lack of balance, it should be quite clear that her issue was not balance or education [“Second Amendment commentary shot balance in the foot,” Dec. 16]. Ms. Letellier’s issue is that her anti-gun bias wasn’t supported and her agenda wasn’t furthered. There is no evidence to support the assertion that the original intent of the Second Amendment was to create a collective right or government power. It simply doesn’t exist. For Ms. Letellier to assert otherwise is tantamount to claiming that history shows that the king traded away the future United States to the Indians for some beads because they held no value. Her assertion that balance (or the appearance thereof) is more important than content is ludicrous. I find it amazing that someone who claims to be a government teacher would think it important to “present the diverse interpretations of this controversial amendmen
