Why include VESID funding as revenue in the Planning Model Tool, since it is in a separate column on the CFR for many vocational programs?
VESID revenue should be handled in one of three ways depending upon the program and services that it is reimbursing. First, if VESID revenue is being used to support a population other than that participating in PROS, it should not be included in the fiscal model. Second, if the VESID revenue is being used to support a program that is distinct from the one included in PROS and the staff are distinct from the PROS staff, then it should not be included in the model. Lastly, if VESID revenue is being used to provide services to individuals who are also PROS participants and there is virtually no distinction between the staff or the program, then the revenue and cost of the staff should be shown on the model. The staff, since they are the same as the PROS program, would be included in the “Number of PROS staff” and the revenue shown on the revenue line.
Related Questions
- The County Planning tool asks for VESID funding to be included in the spreadsheet. Is all VESID funding (WAT, intensive supp employment, and off-site internship) to be included as well as those staff associated with VESID programming?
- Why include VESID funding as revenue in the Planning Model Tool, since it is in a separate column on the CFR for many vocational programs?
- How does the introduction of this new funding model fit into NUITs overall strategic and budgetary planning process?
