Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why include only public colleges and universities?

Colleges public universities
0
Posted

Why include only public colleges and universities?

0

There are several important reasons we have not included private universities in this proposal: (1) targeting public institutions covers 83 percent of all students now attending college; (2) covering the remaining 17 percent in private schools would make the program nearly twice as expensive; and (3) the Labor Party has always supported public schools and if education is to be considered a right, it should be anchored in public institutions. If, as the campaign develops, there is a popular groundswell for extending eligibility to private schools, that could be considered. Some object that excluding private institutions might jeopardize small, tuition-driven non-elite private colleges. If that occurred, many of these institutions could and would find ways to adapt; possibly even by becoming state institutions, which has happened frequently in the 20th century.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123