Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why focus solely on Windows at the expense of portability?

0
Posted

Why focus solely on Windows at the expense of portability?

0

This is a hard question to answer in a satisfactory manner, because the premise is absolutely valid: developers prefer to support multiple platforms or at least have the freedom to change their focus. There is quite a bit of well-deserved ambivalence, if not hostility, towards Windows and the company that produces it. Having worked for the company once known as XVT Software, Inc. in the early 1990’s, I gained an appreciation for both the value of and the incredible demands imposed by software portability. There are existing Lisp-based GUI portability libraries, which I respect for their good intentions, not to mention the huge effort they require. Relatively few Lisp-based GUI libraries target Windows specifically, hence this is a niche I wanted to try to fill. The bottom line is this: I want more people to write GUI applications for Windows in Common Lisp, and I hope you use Graphic-Forms to do it. As for the ABM crowd, if you don’t like Windows, then you’re welcome to ignore this pro

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123