Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why don more researchers self-archive spontaneously?

0
Posted

Why don more researchers self-archive spontaneously?

0

(3a) Unawareness of the possibility of self-archiving (3b) Unawareness of the benefits of self-archiving (3c) Worries that self-archiving might be illegal (3d) Worries that self-archiving might reduce one’s chances of getting published (3e) Worries that self-archiving means abandoning peer review (3f) Worries that self-archiving is technically hard to do (3g) Worries that self-archiving is time-consuming (3i) Laziness (3j) and dozens of other worries (4) But not only do Alma Swan’s international, interdisciplinary author surveys show that 95% of authors will nevertheless comply with self-archiving mandates (over 80% of them willingly), but Arthur Sale’s actual analyses of the success rate of mandated institutional repositories, compared to unmandated ones, fully bear out the results of the surveys: Self-archiving mandates work, just as publish-or-perish mandates (and public smoking bans, and seat-belt regulations) work. Swan, A. (2006) The culture of Open Access: researchers’ views and

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123