Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why doesn SBML Level 2 define a default compartment?

0
Posted

Why doesn SBML Level 2 define a default compartment?

0

Software developers are sometimes bother by the fact that SBML does not specify a default compartment; all compartments in SBML must be defined explicitly. There are several reasons for this: • A model that uses a single unit-volume compartment is making explicit an important underlying assumption about the model. Leaving it implicit would be more prone to errors. • SBML would have to define a reserved identifier to refer to the default compartment. This is a recipe for an eventual identifier collision when someone, somewhere, accidentally uses the same identifier. • A default compartment would only save effort in developing the SBML writing component of a software tool. The writing component is the easy part; reading and interpreting is the harder part. Defining a default compartment would not help readers much, if at all. • A default compartment would be a special case which all SBML parsing programs would have to handle specially.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123