Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why doesn’t mimetic desire lead to a war of all against all?

desire doesn’t lead mimetic War
0
Posted

Why doesn’t mimetic desire lead to a war of all against all?

0

Since mimetic desire often leads to contagious rivalry among individuals and among groups of people, we might naturally assume we would end up in a war of all against all. Yet, instinctively, we know this war would have a disastrous affect. Cultures avert this crisis by using the scapegoat mechanism: People unconsciously redirect the violence they would use against each other onto a surrogate victim, or a scapegoat. Instead of a war of all against all, the war turns into all against one. The community unites against one individual, or one group of people, establishing a bond among the members of the community that creates enough cohesion to form a culture.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123