Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why does two-stage cooling seem to contradict to the “4-hour rule”?

contradict cooling two-stage
0
Posted

Why does two-stage cooling seem to contradict to the “4-hour rule”?

0

While it may appear on the surface that two-stage cooling contradicts the “4-hour rule” you need to look closely at the two-stage cooling method to get the full story. In the past, restaurants had four hours, straight through, to cool food to 41°F or lower. Now the FDA recommends cooling food in two stages — from 135°F to 70°F in two hours then from 70°F to 41°F or lower in an additional four hours for a total cooling time of six hours. However, this does not mean you have six hours straight through. It is important to realize that if the food does not reach 70°F in two hours, you cannot continue to cool the food; the food must be reheated to 165°F for 15 seconds within two hours before another attempt at cooling can be made. To cool food quickly from 135°F to 70°F, a quick chill method (such as an ice bath or ice paddles) must be used. Because you are able to cool food at a rate of over 67 degrees an hour, it is reasonable to say that if you continue to use the same method, it will n

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123