Why does the Mott Foundation require all organizations re-granting with Mott funds to check the terrorism watch lists?
If our funds are re-granted to a listed organization, Mott faces potential penalties, including revocation of tax-exempt status and the freezing of our assets. There is also the potential for criminal and civil penalties. In addition, Mott managers may face possible penalties. [Return to Top] What penalties does an organization re-granting with Mott funds face if it provides support to a listed individual or organization? An organization faces the possibility of its assets being frozen and the revocation of its tax-exempt status. There is also the potential for criminal and civil penalties. In addition, organization managers may face possible penalties. * [Return to Top] What is Executive Order 13224? Executive Order 13224, signed by President George W. Bush in September 2001, authorizes the Executive Branch to block the property of, and prohibits transactions with, persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism. [Return to Top] What is the USA Patriot Act? The USA PATRIO
Related Questions
- What should an organization do if a sub-grantee name appears on one of the terrorism watch lists after the grant has been approved and after the funds have been expended?
- What penalties does an organization re-granting with Mott funds face if it provides support to a listed individual or organization?
- Does the Mott Foundation make grants to network/partnership/consortium organizations?
