Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why does current post-editing practice need a new approach?

0
Posted

Why does current post-editing practice need a new approach?

0

Post-editing today is seen as a translator task. It does not have a independent profile as an activity that we can model and for which we can design and implement support software. We need to guide post-editors more efficiently and enhance their cognitive capacities. We have no good qualitative and quantitative data as yet on post-editor activities. If we can get a better understanding of the cognitive workload in post-editing, we shall also be able to influence the performance of MT engines themselves as adaptive systems, whether SMT or RBMT. If we can rethink these relationships between post-editor and MT system as a dynamic feedback relationship, we may be able to develop a model of post-editing that provides the ultimate quality assurance stage in the localization supply chain. 2. What are you doing to develop this kind of model of post-editing? The research community should try and correlate data from laboratory experiments and interviews of post-editors with mathematical predicti

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123