Why does christianity need to redefine itself every time science shows bible stories to be?
I must have missed something. Last time I looked, Evolution was still a “therory”, The case for a World wide flood, and a good indication that Noah’s Ark (or parts of it) had been found, and etc etc really meant nothing at all except you couldn’t think of anything further to say. You can make claims all day long, but as you atheists like to say, “where’s the proof” The truth is, science has not proven anything along the lines of disproving the Bible. As a mater of fact, when science does prove something beyond any doubt, it always lines up with what the Bible has been saying.
Better do your homework. All Evolution “Proofs” are only proof if you factor in the belief that evolution is fact. Without the assumption that evolution is fact, then is still remains an unproven theory. There has never been any definitive proof of evolution. Evolution only works if you accept that it has to be true. The Ark has never been proved or disproved. The Satellite pictures of the area on Mount Ararat where it is assumed to be only show something there that may be man made or may not. No one has ever managed to climb to it to find the proof one way or another. Science has no more proven the Bible to be wrong than the Bible has proven Science to be wrong. They both leave room for debate and must be accepted on faith. Most Scientific Theories are discarded after being proven wrong or kept after being proven correct. Your stated examples have never been proven either way but they are as tenacious as Religion. The difference is, people believe in Christianity because for the last
