Why does another property site say that tenancy agreements aren’t as good as government leases?
We are aware of one local commission agent, a Yugoslavian fellow who speaks very poorly of tenancy agreements; however we believe that this is simply due to a misunderstanding of Tongan law on his part. Tenancy agreements are as legal and binding as government leases, were created by the President of the Tongan Lawyer’s Association, and are even used by the government itself when they lease buildings. The misunderstanding and controversy seems to have come about due to the fact that tenancy agreements are specifically for buildings and not for raw land. The “local commission” agent who speaks so negatively about tenancy agreements does so because he has never listed or sold a business or home, but only leased raw land, therefore he simply doesn’t understand the legalities of tenancy agreements in relation to such things. Furthermore, while this fellow has written against legal tenancy agreements in the past, he is currently advertising and offering 50 year government land leases on com
Related Questions
- Ive bought a property to rent out (buy to let). Can The Conveyancing Guide help me with tenancy agreements and other landlord tenant issues?
- Why does another property site say that tenancy agreements aren’t as good as government leases?
- Is having an Archaeological site on the property a good or bad thing?
