Why do we not reduce reliance on mobile classrooms as called for in planning assumptions adopted in September 2005?
The goals established by the Board of Education and Board of Commissioners in September called for reducing the percentage of students housed in mobile or modular classrooms to 8% by 2012. In 2005, about 27% of elementary students, 15% of middle school students, and 14% of high school students were in classes in mobile or modular classrooms. 109 additional mobile or modular classrooms are being installed for the 2006-07 school year. Significant progress toward the goal would require at least three additional new elementary schools, two additional middle schools, and an additional new high school and add more than $250 million to the funding request. The current proposal reduces the percentage in elementary school to approximately 19%, increases the percentage in middle school to 18% and slightly increases the percentage in high schools to about 15%.
Related Questions
- One of the assumptions of repeated measures ANOVA is called sphericity or circularity (the two are synonyms), explained here. How can you know if data violate this assumption?
- Why do we not reduce reliance on mobile classrooms as called for in planning assumptions adopted in September 2005?
- Why do we not propose to lower utilization rates as called for in planning assumptions adopted in September 2005?
