Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why do the relative shares as calculated by the NRAC Formula differ from the actual shares that Boards receive of the final allocations?

0
Posted

Why do the relative shares as calculated by the NRAC Formula differ from the actual shares that Boards receive of the final allocations?

0

This issue relates to the movement towards parity. The Scottish Executive Health Department (SEHD) phased in the Arbuthnott Formula by way of ‘differential growth’ whereby all Boards would continue to enjoy real-terms growth in their allocations year-on-year, with those above parity (i.e. above their target share) receiving less growth than those below parity until the new distribution was achieved. This is still ongoing as not all Boards have reached their “parity” positions (i.e. their target share).

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123