Why do some countries have more stringent radiofrequency (RF) exposure standards? Are individuals in those countries receiving a greater level of protection?
RF exposure standards have been developed by several organizations and countries over the past three decades. In North America and most of Europe, these standards have generally been based on the lowest exposure level at which potential harmful effects to humans could occur. Safety factors are then incorporated to arrive at recommended exposure levels for protection of the general public and personnel working in controlled environments. Not all standards throughout the world have the same recommended exposure limits; some are more stringent than others. The variations of recommended limits may be attributed to differences in the philosophy, the methodology and the interpretation of scientific data used for standard development. However, recognized exposure standards that are based on established effects should be distinguished from some municipal and/or state guidelines that are based on socio-political considerations. There is no scientific basis to support a conclusion that individua
Related Questions
- Why do some countries have more stringent radiofrequency (RF) exposure standards? Are individuals in those countries receiving a greater level of protection?
- Why do some countries have more stringent RF exposure standards? Are individuals in these countries receiving a greater level of protection?
- Why did Canada develop its own radiofrequency (RF) exposure guideline rather than adopt an existing international standard?
