Why do humans persist in behaving in recognized destructive ways at the individual level?
on human behavior and in one of them is the casual premise that some particular universal human behavior starts de novo as such. My view is that this source aversion anticipates the political tensions associated with academic longevity and brotherhood, the ecology in which essentially all thinkers in this field prosper and feed their families. The second serious error is the recurrent practice of (reflexly) attributing common antisocial behaviors to environmental circumstances, whether it is genocide, racism, tribalism, juvenile delinquency, adolescent ennui, rape, drug addiction, etc. As in, ‘John is a racist because his parents are racists’. Or, ‘People often commit suicide that are despondent over an emotional loss.’ Or, despite thousands of examples of successful and abusive despotism, there is either no evolutionary curiosity whatsoever regarding the common behavior of the tyrannized subjects, or, if there is some local reflection, the explanation refers to irresistible force of a
Related Questions
- What is the qualifying level of cost (minimum/maximum) on an individual item for purchasing equipment with grant funds?
- If an individual has qualifying swim time for varsity, will he be able to compete at that level?
- Why do humans persist in behaving in recognized destructive ways at the individual level?
