Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why do evolutionary scientists blatantly overlook the law of biogenesis when considering the origin of life…?

0
Posted

Why do evolutionary scientists blatantly overlook the law of biogenesis when considering the origin of life…?

0

I was curious about slice’s article, so I read it. It doesn’t say scientists created life. It says they were able to synthesize two elements of RNA. That is not the same thing as creating life. Here is an exact quote from the article: “Two essential elements of RNA have finally been made from scratch, under conditions similar to those that likely prevailed during the dawn of life. The question of how a molecule capable of storing genetic information – even DNA’s simpler cousin RNA – could ever have arisen spontaneously in the primordial cooking pot has perplexed scientists for decades. RNA consists of a long chain composed of four different types of ribonucleotides, which each consist of a nitrogenous base, a sugar and a phosphate.” It sounds to me like they mixed some chemicals together and managed to form some compounds. I’m not all that impressed. So far, no scientist has been able to create life. They just say “it’s possible.” If it can be done, let’s see you do it.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123