Why do creationists love using DNA as an argument against evolution?
First, it’s useful to remember that all creationist arguments are dishonest – most are based on lies – and that most of them have no idea what evolution is. Given that, it seems foolish to expect that creationists will offer a rational debate. You should never expect them to listen to anything that supports evolution because they’re not interested in learning about anything – they merely repeat their arguments over and over to encourage others to do the same. Creationism is not a theory; it is a reaction to a theory. They’re not really debating, they’re merely sowing doubt; that’s all they want. Enough doubt, whether it’s justified or not, makes lasting opinions especially in young, uneducated minds. So given that they don’t know what they’re talking about, and they’re not really interested in the truth, how do they spread doubt? They accuse their opponents of the very things that they themselves do. They blindly argue that something is wrong especially when they have no clue about wha
