Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why do Atheist say gravity is only a theory when defending there faith in evolution?

0
Posted

Why do Atheist say gravity is only a theory when defending there faith in evolution?

0

Scientific theory doesn’t mean theory the way, say conspiracy theory means theory. Scientific theory is why things that are fact happen. Scientific theory holds up to testing. Now, just because you’re under the impression that evolution means we jump species doesn’t mean you’re right. Evolution is observed and has been shown to happen. Just as gravity happens. Now, go open an 8th grade science textbook. A real one. Not one that says Creation Science or Intelligent Design on the cover or in the introduction. Then maybe you’ll understand how it works.

0

Gravity is a fact. It happens. How it happens is a theory. Evolution is a fact. We have watched it happen. How it happens is a theory.

0

Because, Gravity is as much a theory as Evolution. Evolution is observed EVERY DAY! Please, read a biology book before you read carm.org.

0

Every scientific concept is a theory many such as gravity and evolution are also facts You shouldn’t have dropped out of high school

0

We can observe the effects of gravitation, but we need theories to explain why it works. Newton had a pretty good one, but it turned out it wasn’t sufficient to explain all the data. The theory had to be refined. We can observe changes in species over time. We need a theory to explain the mechanism. Darwin had a pretty good one, but it turned out it wasn’t entirely sufficient to explain all the data once genetics were discovered. The theory had to be refined. Darwin derived his theory from observations in nature, made during a five year round the world voyage. The fossil evidence was not anything he based his idea upon; it was the current biodiversity of this planet which led him to form his description of the way nature works. Had Darwin never existed, Alfred Wallace was making similar observations. Had Wallace not existed, others would have made similar observations. Why? Because just like watching an apple fall to the ground, seeing how species change over many many generations is s

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123