Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why didn the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers do the full environmental review?

0
Posted

Why didn the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers do the full environmental review?

0

Good question. Although all major federal projects, particularly those that have major impact, are expected to undergo an environmental review, there is a shortcut. Instead of the full review or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) the agency could do an Environmental Assessment (EA). This is far less intensive and frequently results in the advocate for the project simply declaring a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). The Corps did an EA in Zilwaukee. The EPA, in documents recovered through FOIA, has questioned the factual basis for the Corps’ position. The Lone Tree Council, a local environmental group and one of the sponsors of this website, is presently in federal court arguing that the Corps should have done the more complete review. The Council, represented by attorneys with the National Wildlife Federation, is also contesting the lack of water treatment.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123