Why did these representatives for antagonistic interests reach unanimous agreement when lawmakers could not come close?
As we see it, the representatives outside the legislature had a much easier job. Each one spoke for a group of constituents with an agreed-upon agenda. And each representative knew that to advance his or her group’s agenda, he would need to reach an agreement with their long-standing adversaries. Each representative could then explain to everyone in his or her camp exactly how that agreement with their long-time foes was the most realistic way to advance their own interests. Your situation is much harder. Your constituents have a wide range of opinions on every issue you have to deal with. On top of that, you also owe loyalty to your party leaders. And you owe allegiance to colleagues whose support you need on measures you care deeply about. You are also indebted to key backers who have helped you win elections. All of these are your constituencies, and they can disagree on every topic under the sun. So, any action you take on a controversial issue is bound to draw fire from many direc
