Why did the U.S. start a war in Iraq?
For the last two and a half years, unfolding events have revealed the startling Bush administrations true motives for war. Behind the false reasons given for attacking Iraq, the neoconservatives ambitious agenda was to dominate the Middle East, and eventually the world. By removing Saddam, the U.S. could control the flow of Iraqs oil, change regime by installing a puppet government, and establish a footing for launching future wars within the region. Despite the Bush administrations claim that the invasion of Iraq was not for oil by turning the oil fields over to the Iraqi puppet government, the U.S. government supported by oil conglomerates plan to seize control of Iraqs economy by privatizing Iraqs oil, which was backed by senior figures in the Iraqi Oil Ministry, under the Production Sharing Agreements (PSAs) that will be put into effect as soon as an apparent legitimate government is established. According to the Crude Design report, 64 percent of Iraqs oil reserves so far have bee
For the last two and a half years, unfolding events have revealed the startling Bush administration’s true motives for war. Behind the false reasons given for attacking Iraq, the neoconservatives’ ambitious agenda was to dominate the Middle East, and eventually the world. By removing Saddam, the U.S. could control the flow of Iraq’s oil, change regime by installing a puppet government, and establish a footing for launching future wars within the region. Despite the Bush administration’s claim that the invasion of Iraq was not for oil by turning the oil fields over to the Iraqi puppet government, the U.S. government supported by oil conglomerates plan to seize control of Iraq’s economy by privatizing Iraq’s oil, which was backed by senior figures in the Iraqi Oil Ministry, under the Production Sharing Agreements (PSAs) that will be put into effect as soon as an apparent “legitimate” government is established. According to the Crude Design report, 64 percent of Iraq’s oil reserves so far
