Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why did the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency believe the Site poses a risk to human health and the environment?

0
Posted

Why did the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency believe the Site poses a risk to human health and the environment?

0

Prior studies indicated that a number of industrial-related materials are present in some of the soils and shallow ground waters at the Site. Examples include petroleum products, industrial solvents, paint, thinner and lacquers, herbicides, batteries, contaminated and used oil, spent antifreeze, polychlorinated biphenyls, metals. These materials are regulated as hazardous substances and solid wastes under EPA regulations. EPA believed that past releases of these materials at the Site required further study to determine whether they pose a risk to human health or the environment.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123