Why Did DOJ the White House Protect Truscott?
I said earlier than Truscott reminds me of Rachel Paulose, so on one level, it should not be surprise DOJ protected Truscott. DOJ made several efforts to help Paulose stay in her USA position. And when Mukasey came in, they quietly moved Paulose to another position in DOJ rather than firing her. But the thing is, we know why DOJ was so loyal to Paulose. In addition to being one of Gonzales’ clique members, Paulose had defended the GOP in an election-related case, defended a faith-based healthcare program, and had fought against non-American detainees claiming rights via international treaties. Paulose had demonstrated, both ideologically and through her work, that she was a loyal member of Bush’s team. So they showed her the same loyalty in return. So what did Carl Truscott do to deserve the same loyal treatment? Domenech’s complaint makes it clear that Truscott’s protection came directly from the White House. In December 2006, Messrs. Domenech and [Director of Field Operations] approa
Related Questions
- What is the White House willing to do to continue to protect the privacy of visitors to government websites, even as it utilizes tools other than cookies that can do similar tracking?
- Can the device protect Capitol Hill, the White House, the Pentagon and other federal buildings from aircrafts that are taking off or landing at nearby Reagan Airport?
- Why Did DOJ the White House Protect Truscott?
