Why did a position that was used as an anchor point come back at a different level at the conclusion of job mapping?
The anchoring process was a preliminary assessment of a position for a given job title prior to a review of the actual completed job description. While this initial assessment was reviewed in the course of finalizing campuswide mapping recommendations for these positions, we were also careful to apply the same standards of review to anchored positions as all others on campus, including the need to review customized key responsibilities and problem solving sections of the job description. Because of this need for final review, we communicated that the final mapping decision for anchored positions would be confirmed upon review of a completed job description. Once Compensation was able to compare descriptions submitted from departments across campus for each job title, and analyze input from Job Family Advisory Committees, they were able to finalize new job titles for everyone, including anchored positions.
Related Questions
- If two persons of different sexes with the same level of qualifications, soft skills and experience apply for a job - how is the hiring decision made?
- Why did a position that was used as an anchor point come back at a different level at the conclusion of job mapping?
- Why are two different job evaluation schemes being used?
