Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why Competing Leaderships are not an Anarchy?

anarchy Competing leaderships
0
Posted

Why Competing Leaderships are not an Anarchy?

0

The Anarchical view is depicted by a desire to remove the entire existing governmental establishment, in hope that afterwards the individuals can organize themselves better, somehow. Solving does not support such a revolutionary change. For once, the elements of the government that are necessary for proper functioning of the state (Electricity, Water supply, Police, Military, the Courts System, etc.) will remain in place and fully functional until and if they can be replaced by corresponding private services. Moreover, Solving does not sanction balantly unethical and irrational legal systems that positively violate the individual rights of any individual. For example, if you propose a legal system in which any individual can kill any innocent individual without being prosecuted, this will not be a valid Solving legal system and you will not be a valid Solving leader. Solving wishes for the Government to face the same competitive constraints as free-enterprise Capitalism or the open-sou

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123