Why can’t we run the 2007/08 methodology and the new 2008/09 methodology side-by-side for the first year of change so we can have comparable data?
It is recommended that success rates for 2008/09 below national level, for example provider level, are calculated and published using only one methodology – the new one. This is recommended because to generate and publish success rates in both ways would lead to confusion for learners, providers and agencies when reporting trends and performance. Back to top 7. What are the main principles and changes to the 2008/09 Learner Responsive success rate methodology? Changes to ensure that the 2008/09 methodology reflects demand-led funding: • For the 2008/09 academic year only within the 2008/09 success rate methodology, remove the use of the Census reference date (1st November) to determine the inclusion/ exclusion of learners and replace with the appropriate length of time that a learner needs to be enrolled on a learning aim to receive funding (6 weeks/ 2 weeks, depending on course length). • Report on the Learner Responsive provision as it is defined i.e. without the inclusion of FE NVQs
Related Questions
- Why can’t we run the 2007/08 methodology and the new 2008/09 methodology side-by-side for the first year of change so we can have comparable data?
- Why is my Pricing run always issuing the policies in July when my valuation date is end of the year? Are there any options?
- Does a membership run on a calendar year or the date submitted on the application?
