Why can’t Japan build a jumbo jet?
The large-aircraft industry has long been supported by government funding. Boeing’s early money-winners, the 707 and 747 lines, started out as military transport planes and were later adapted for passenger service.² Airbus started out with a huge amount of funding by the British, French and West German governments as a way to jump-start the lagging European aerospace industry, and its parent company EADS is still subsidized to develop military aircraft for European forces. The other country to develop a significant big-plane industry was the Soviet Union in its heyday, and since the collapse of its command economy, its once-great aircraft manufacturers like Antonov and Ilyushin have been relegated to making poor copies of designs developed elsewhere. While we all know Japan has no qualms about throwing tons of money at questionable business plans, the state’s obvious disadvantage here is Article 9. Strategic military infrastructure is legally out of the government’s reach, yet this is
Related Questions
- My product has a "T" mark approval from the Japanese Government, based on JET (Japan Electrical Testing Laboratories) test data. Will UL accept this approval and authorize use of the UL Label?
- My product has a "T" mark approval from the Japanese Government, based on JET (Japan Electrical Testing Laboratories) test data. Will UL accept this approval and authorize use of the UL Label?
- Would it be possible to land a Jumbo Jet on an aircraft carrier?
- Would it be possible to land a Jumbo Jet on an aircraft carrier?
- How many seats does a standard 747 jumbo jet have?
- Why can’t Japan build a jumbo jet?