Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why aren more lands outside Olympic National Park considered suitable wolf habitat?

0
Posted

Why aren more lands outside Olympic National Park considered suitable wolf habitat?

0

Most of the land on the Olympic Peninsula outside the Park contains too many roads to be considered suitable wolf habitat as defined in this study. Some lands are at too high an elevation to provide year-round wolf habitat. The remaining lands were not considered large enough to support enough deer and elk to sustain at least two wolves year-round. The result is that 78 percent of the area considered suitable wolf habitat on the Olympic Peninsula is within the Olympic National Park and 19 percent is on the Olympic National Forest. The remaining lands (about 3 percent) are distributed among state, tribal and private ownership.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123