Why aren journalists required to go through the IRB review process? How does journalism differ from research with human subjects?
The definition of “research” refers to a “systematic investigation “designed to contribute to “generalizable knowledge”. While it’s true that journalists can engage in a “systematic” investigation, generally speaking, the end result of their interviews is simply reported (or quoted) and synthesis or interpretation of what was said is not offered and no attempt is made to generalize. This differs from a researcher who would attempt to analyze and synthesize the information in some way in order to be able to apply the newfound knowledge to others or for the benefit of others. It is, of course, possible for journalism students and faculty to engage in activities that would meet the federal definitions of research with human subjects, in which case IRB approval of the project would be required.
Related Questions
- If a quality improvement project is human subjects research requiring IRB review, do I need to obtain separate IRB approval from every institution engaged in the project?
- Does IRB review of a quality improvement project that is also non-exempt human subjects research always need to be carried out at a convened IRB meeting?
- Why aren journalists required to go through the IRB review process? How does journalism differ from research with human subjects?
