Why are some states more fully represented by way of sheer volume of documents in the E-Library?
Some states, such as Florida, California, and Colorado, have a multiplicity of documents from several different sources within the E-Library, while other states have very few or no documents. This unequal representation is easily explained in the fact that states like Florida are considered “bellwether” states: these states continually act as innovators in the LUCs arena. Their actions are considered indicators of future trends. Because www.lucs.org is not an LUC tracking system, we have selected certain states that have examples of different types of LUCs, which can inform our users.
Related Questions
- I am a member of a fully or partially recognised overseas accounting body – do I need to supply my tertiary documents?
- Why are some states more fully represented by way of sheer volume of documents in the E-Library?
- How will the volume of Student new hires be handled so that documents are processed efficiently?
