Why are people so stubborn when it comes to the truth behind 911?
Because they can’t handle the truth. About ten years ago I read my first conspiracy document. And while some of it was pure speculation, it was world shattering. It kicked off my first major depressive episode and life has never been the same. But I would not go back to ignorance for one second. I only wish I knew how to wake everybody else up, it’s our only hope.
Well, first off, I was at the foot of the WTC at midnight on September 11th, 2001 –no joke– I had gotten out from the Angelika where I saw “Our Lady of the Assassins”. Something brought me there. I’m a bit psychic. I’ve known when other people were going to die before they died. I really didn’t know THAT that day…I just felt something telling me to go to NYC, so I did. People are in denial. Many things have been brought to my attention that even I fought very hard not to believe. I have to go, but let me just say a few things: The New World Order is real. Luciferians rule America–sounds funny, doesn’t it? The television brainwashes people. The Federal Reserve and the IRS are privately owned and corrupt, as is our entire government. It’s all a sham. Just like it says the movie The Matrix -we’re slaves …we think we’re free, but we’re not. Those in power & Satan use our differences against us. We are divine creations and they don’t want us to realize it. I sound crazy, but I’ve bee
Your question proves the problem. You want people to believe YOUR OPINION. Just because its what you belive doesn’t make it the TRUTH. If you really are a studying engineer I would ask you to look up some reference cases for what has to be done to a sizeable building to deliberately bring it down in the way that WTC7 came down. Its weeks of work, significant structural weakening (knocking walls out) and could not be done covertly. Look at the many Las Vegas casinos which have been demolished in this way, and then look at what has to be done in order to make them fall. Its also no good saying that “a retired US general” has said blah blah. Name him and his credentials and then people can check on whether he actually was a US general and how he would have access to facts on this. People always say “a top scientist” or a “retired general” or “leading structural engineer” but I have never seen a credible or qualifed one identified. I have however seen a lot of unqualified people with opini
