Why are homosexuals held to different standards of conduct than heterosexuals?
This thought first hit me the day after the “fat naked fag” Richard Hatch won the Survivor TV game show. The final episode was the only episode of the show I watched, as TV’s not really my bag, baby. I watched it only at the behest of my houseguest, who convinced me to watch because Richard was a “hot bear”. As I watched the show, and got some of the background to how the last 3 contestants got to that point, I grudgingly admitted a fascination for these people. I was pleased that Richard had made it so far by truly playing the game using a strategy of survival that included manipulation of his fellow game players. Somehow, though, this was interpreted as a bad trait, and some press accounts I’ve read seem to imply that Richard shouldn’t have won, because he manipulated people. There were even allusions to the fact that manipulation is often a tactic of homosexual activists (shocker!!). Media accounts seem to be disappointed that Richard didn’t do the “right” thing in winning the game.
Related Questions
- Why does the IFC have a different set of environmental and social Performance Standards from the World Bank, and how do they differ from the World Bank safeguard policies?
- Does the code of conduct required under the Mass. Rules follow the standards in the PhRMA and AdvaMed Codes for financial relationships with physicians?
- Are different people held to different standards of care?
