Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why another rating system? What’s wrong with the current ratings and labels?

labels rating ratings wrong
0
10 Posted

Why another rating system? What’s wrong with the current ratings and labels?

0

A plethora of standards, labels, and ratings are now available addressing the environmental characteristics of building materials. The challenge is sorting out the green from the green wash, and putting into context this bewildering array of eco-labels. Some are good, reliable sources of information, but address only one aspect of a materials’ impact, such as indoor air quality or recycled content. Some represent the consensus of stakeholders and have a process for update and change, while others are developed and managed solely by industry trade associations and are protected from change. Many are based on meeting a “good-enough” standard and don’t differentiate between the products that are squeaking past and those that are going the extra mile to become best practice. Some issues aren’t addressed at all by any standard. Pharos is not seeking to replace current standards. Rather it is designed to work with current standards, labels, and rating systems to help place them into context,

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.