Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why another lisp implementation?

Implementation LISP
0
Posted

Why another lisp implementation?

0

Well, you must be joking. Compared to other worlds, such as the Scheme area, the number of implementations of Common-Lisp is rather small. In any case, ECL has several nice features which make it extremely valuable: • It is small. The library is about 1Mb and makes extensive use of the capabilities of your C/C++ environment, thereby reusing a lot of code. • It is extremely portable. It does not rely on knowledge of binary file formats and other things which make maintainance very complicated. • It interacts very well with the C/C++ world. ECL can be embedded as an extension language in C/C++ applications. Furthermore, it provides a lisp-to-C/C++ translator, and you can inline C/C++ code in your lisp code. • It provides efficient interpreted code. ECL features a rather small, but rather fast bytecodes compiler and interpreter.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123